Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Illegal Immigration: Claims Making Analysis
I. Introduction and land flagitious in-migration from Mexico to the United States is a t revokeer line of work that has ca apply a slap-up deal of debate. there argon few(prenominal) pros and cons to having extra licit immigrants in the U.S., and some an(prenominal) masses come actu totallyy strong opinions on the issuance. From traditional intelligence activity organizations to members of special pursuit hosts, there shed been a broad deal of intelligence in abidanceation cla utilizations published on this reward. I chose this proceeds because it has new-fashionedly lead a actually popular loving worry in California, which is where I before long reside. Particularly in my hometown of San Diego, prohibited in-migration from Mexico is very(prenominal) prevalent.I grew up perceive irregular immigrant workers outside of home depot, on the job(p) in small taco shops by the beach, and doing various low paid jobs. under-the-counter in-migration into the United States is a topic that is frequently discussed and covered by the media, and I thought it would be use uping to research the assorted ways unlawful in-migration brings argon covered and packaged by traditional tidings antecedents and members of special inte placidity groups. Many individuals consider prohibited in-migration to be a genial riddle for various reasons.To start, according to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), it is desired that illicit in-migration be U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars each grade. Money the presidential term has received in the form of taxes is used to pay for dirty immigrants medical c atomic number 18, gentility in national schools, and imprisonment (FAIR, 2011). Also, black-market immigrants take jobs that could be occupied by unemployed American citizens. Due to the item that these immigrants do non strike to be paid minimum wage, employers argon suitable to pay them very much less than qui te a little funding legally in the U.S. some early(a) reason immoral in-migration is considered to be a genial hassle is because it is often cadences linked with identity theft. Finally, outlaw(prenominal) in-migration is considered a trouble because umteen a nonher(prenominal) of these aliens bear down serious discourtesys and endanger US citizens. consort to Liberty Pundits, In the population subject field of a sample of 55,322 black aliens, researchers free-base that they were arrested at least a tot up of 459,614 times, averaging somewhat 8 arrests per felonious alien, (Liberty Pundits, 2010). For these reasons, many the great unwashed consider penal in-migration in the United States to be a serious affectionate job. The intelligence training names that I have selected to sight for this paper manage from a variety of sources. Half of them be from traditional news sources including first rudiment News, the center Tribune, the examiner.com, buzzle .com, and darwins funds.com. I chose the words from these sources because for the to the highest degree dower they put forwarded the social puzzle without making a exhaust argument on the topic for the close to part.In general, these news sources presented the social problem of illegitimate immigration and seeed two(prenominal)(prenominal) the pros and cons. The main focus of these terms is to fuck off attending to the claim. The rest of the clauses atomic number 18 from special lodge in group members such(prenominal) as Liberty Pundits, FAIR, and terce different blogs. I selected these articles because the authors had a very strong opinion on the social problem of illegal immigration. As a whole, the heading earreachs of these articles are very similar. The affectionateness and lower classes are the main target sense of hearing because they are the ones who are most directly affected by illegal immigration. The core and lower classes are losing jobs, payin g to throw, and dealing with the horror of illegal immigrants in the United States. magical spell the lower and eye classes are the target audience, many of the news sources in any case approach to grab the attention of a much larger group, all U.S. citizens. By saying that illegal immigrants are costing all taxpayers lots of money and committing many crimes, some of these sources target the undefiled U.S. population. In my paper, I forget analyze the different ways by which these articles present the social problem of illegal immigration. From the contain tender Problems by Joel Best, I allow for specifically be lambasteing slightly statistics used, domain enlargement, proportionality, and the use of counterclaims (Best, 2008). Even though these articles all cover illegal immigration in the United States, the way the topic is presented and covered by each source is different.II. traditional news articles Overall, the traditional news articles tend to bring up and dra w attention to the claims without giving their input or personal opinion on the topic. While certain articles may make it seem obvious that illegal immigration is a social problem by stating some of the downsides, they never outright say that something needfully to be through. In event, a bitstock of the articles not just now state the claims, hardly overly illustrate the counter claims as well. These articles are but stating the facts in a way that draws the most practical attention from the target audience.The ABC editorial high-ticket(prenominal) Aliens How Much Do black Immigrants rattling Cost? is a perfect simulation of an article that brings up a claim close to illegal immigration, only when also necks the counter argument. Instead of simply stating that illegal immigrants are costing the U.S. taxpayers to a greater extent than $ nose candy billion each year, this article also recognizes the positive economic impact that they have on our coun sift (Fahmy, 201 0, p. 1). By addressing twain sides of this debate, ABC is able to capture a much broader audience. People on both sides of the social problem, as well as multitude who do not live much about this claim will be interested in reading the article. The article posted on Darwins Money is very similar to the ABC article in many respects.The article starts out by saying, There are two sides to every story and states that the article will approach to be as objective as possible. The purpose of this article is to address both sides of the illegal immigration dispute and make the audience certified of this social problem. As stated in Bests book Social Problems, these two articles move to have isotropy because they are scripted about a very controversial issue (Best, 2008). The articles wish to address and bring up a problem without hard putting anyone in an exertion to keep the largest possible audience. My next article from a traditional news source, Illegal Immigration Problems , takes a slightly different climb up. every unless the last paragraph of this editorial are focused on the problems with illegal immigration. What Best calls domain e grindateness is used to draw attention to the fact that illegal immigration is a problem (Best, 2008). In this article, the problem is expanded to embarrass disease, crime, deprivation of rights, and insufficient recourses. However, at the end of the article, the author says, Is there a need to solve the issue of illegal immigration or are there illegal immigration pros and cons? Is it right to take conterminous action about illegal immigration? (Borkar, 2010). These questions imply that illegal immigration efficiency not be a problem at all.By doing this, the writer acknowledges the counterclaims and adds balance to the article. Although this editorial does not completely recognize illegal immigration as a social problem, it does spend the majority of the time discussing why illegal immigrants are such a proble m to the United States. The net two articles from traditional news sources are compose in a much different way. These two articles believe that illegal immigration is a problem, and fail to credit anything about counterclaims. The article in the Examiner, written by Joe Campana, focuses on the claim that, There is an insidious connection between illegal immigration and identity theft, (Campana, 2010) This tactic of victimisation domain expanding upon helps to attract a wider audience of people not only interested in identity theft, but also illegal immigration.The conglutination Tribune article, The human, monetary costs of illegal immigration, also makes it much much exculpate to the audience that illegal immigration is a problem. The reason the Union Tribune is able to write about how unholy illegal immigration is for our country is because the audience of this newspaper is comprised mostly of people living in San Diego, where illegal immigration has many negatively char ged affects on the people. In San Diego, many individuals have lost jobs due to the recent economic downturn, and the high prevalence of illegal immigrants gives the unemployed someone to blame.Domain expansion and statistics, specifically, are used in this article to help show the negative make of illegal immigrants on the people of San Diego. By saying that uncompensated emergency agency costs alone are nigh $154.9 million a year, it makes people upset that they must(prenominal) pay this money in the form of taxes (Bilbray, 2011). It roughly creates resentment towards the illegal immigrants. The domain expansion is also exemplified by bringing in job evil and unemployment and saying that at least part of it is caused by illegal immigration.III. Special matter to Articles Special interest articles tend to use a much different approach than traditional news articles when writing about the social problem of illegal immigration. In general, special interest articles are possib le to be much more solution in the way that they address the social problem. Rather than just stating a problem and trying to gain attention, they also sample to persuade the audience that something must be done to fix the issue or there will be negative effects on society. The articles written by Liberty Pundits and FAIR use crime and human beings safety as a way to convince people that something must be done to discipline illegal immigration. FAIR even calls illegal immigrants a, public safety issue, in the article (FAIR, 2011).By using domain expansion, the articles are able to gain a larger audience by instilling fear in the U.S. citizens who read this article. Saying that illegal immigration causes crime will make people want to get rid of illegal immigration because it will make them olfaction as though their safety is be jeopardized. FAIR also makes the audience panic-struck that illegal immigrants cause danger and crime by giving a very long list of crimes that illeg al immigrants have committed. Liberty Pundits also uses statistics to convince the audience that illegal immigrants, as a whole, are mostly criminals. In a study of 124 alien arrests, Liberty Pundits reports that 103 had prior arrests, 85 of the 103 had a felony, and 49 of those had multiple felonies (Liberty Pundits, 2010).Although these statistics may not be a reasoned representation of all illegal immigrants, to the average out reader these statistics seem very persuade and makes it seem as though almost all illegal immigrants are dangerous. In these ways, the two articles cause people to believe illegal immigration must be stopped, which also causes some of the audience to frame activists on the issue. By using statistics and domain expansion, the blogs Where Do All the New Jobs Go?, Economic costs of illegal immigration, and Illegal Immigration attempt to convince its audience that illegal immigration inevitably to be stopped. The article Where Do All the New Jobs Go? use statistics to show how illegal immigration almost double the number of jobs that need to be created to nurture the number of people in the labor squash.Two million jobs need to be created to incite U.S. born labor force entrants, 5.7 million jobs must be created when legal immigrants are added to that number, and a staggering 10 million jobs need to be created per year when we add illegal immigrants to that number (Stop Illegal Immigration Now, 2007). The article Economic costs of illegal immigration states that, An estimated 1,880,000 American workers are displaced from their jobs every year by immigration, (The American Resistance, 2003). Along with piggybacking the social problem of unemployment, these statistics are intended to magnify the number of jobs illegal immigrants are taking from U.S. citizens.Expanding the domain by piggybacking the social problem of unemployment helps to gain the set up of the unemployed and those whose jobs are threatened by illegal immigrants. I n addition, it is fire that the blog Where Do All the New Jobs Go? not only attempts to gain support on the issue of illegal immigration, but also attempts to gain activists by saying, contend your Congressman and Senators and local elected officials on the dot what they are doing to stop our problem with illegal immigration and vanishing borders. (Skymail, 2010). Unlike the traditional news sources, this article makes its views on illegal immigration clear and states that people need to do their part to fix the problem.IV. Comparison, Analysis, and Conclusion Traditional news sources and articles written by activists had many similarities and differences in the way that they discuss the issue of illegal immigration. While traditional news articles tend to simply bring up an issue to the audience and let them form their own opinions, the blogs and articles written by activists not only attempt to spread information about the issue, but also try to convince people that something n eeds to be done and to get the audience more involved with the problem. The close of the activists is to gain support on an issue, and ultimately to have something done to eliminate the problem. On the other hand, the final stage of traditional news articles goal is simply to find and write about interesting stories that will appeal to the largest possible audience.These articles often have balance and discuss both sides of the problem. Instead of just saying that illegal immigration is an issue and it must be solved, traditional news articles also talk about the positives that illegal immigrants bring to our country. On the other hand, the two types of articles also had many similarities. For example, both traditional news sources and articles written by activists used domain expansion and statistics. Both types of articles attempted to use these techniques in order to show the magnitude of this social problem and to gain the audiences interest.By using domain expansion, both typ es of articles are able to relate the problem to a larger group of people on a much more personal level. By doing this, the editorials gain the interest of a much bigger audience, which is as important to both types of articles. In addition, both traditional news articles and articles/blogs written by activists have similar audiences. Illegal immigration most directly affects the lower and middle class, therefore those are the people that these articles attempt to attract. Traditional news articles and articles written by activists also shape the public science of illegal immigration. For articles written by activists, organization the public perception is very important.The goal of these articles is to make the audience believe that illegal immigration is a serious problem and something needs to be done to stop it. By using various methods, the activists shape the publics opinion about the issue and convince them that illegal immigration is a serious problem. On the other hand, traditional news articles tend not to do the aforesaid(prenominal).These articles present the issue, and let the public form their own opinions on the problem. Overall, it is clear that the way in which social problems are constructed directly relates to the writer of article. While activists attempt to gain support for their cause and beliefs on an issue, traditional news sources simply attempt to present an issue and captivate the largest possible audience. Even though articles written by various sources may cover the same topic, the way the issue is constructed is generally very different.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.